Legal Opinion

Cheyne v. Deike

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloper, J.

(Pro Tempore).

This is a personal injury action arising under the guest passenger statute, ORS 30.115, ① in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained while a passenger in a car operated by defendant Mary Lynn Deike and owned and maintained by defendant Harold Deike under the family purpose doctrine. The jury, after a lengthy trial, returned a verdict for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. "We affirm.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for a mistrial; and that the court erred in its instructions to the jury.

The trial lasted two weeks,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mount v. WelshOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Salistean v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Yates v. LargeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Shrock v. GoodellOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bogue v. McKibbenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bogue v. McKibbenOregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API