Legal Opinion

Freifeld v. Sire

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 22, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eighth District. Action by George Freifeld and another against Henry B. Sire. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Per curiam

A former trial was had, at which no proper demand for a jury was made. The judgment was reversed, and a new trial ordered. When the case came on again for trial, the defendant demanded a jury. The court denied the motion on the following ground:

“The case is proceeding on the same footing as the former trial. The issues are the same, and this is simply a new trial ordered by the Appellate Term.”

*145Exception was taken by defendant.

The question presented is one of a waiver by defendant of his right to a jury trial by reason of his failure to demand a jury trial at the time designated in the precept…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manheim v. SeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Manheim v. SeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tracy v. FalveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Tracy v. FalveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API