Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Bistes

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 28, 2010No. 2009-CA-00660-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Michael Whalen sought specific performance or, alternatively, damages for breach of contract, relating to a land-sale agreement he attempted to broker between Gregory Bistes Jr. and the Bradshaw . Family Limited Partnership. The chancellor granted summary judgment in Bistes’s favor and found that Whalen’s undisclosed dual-agency representation of both Bistes and the Partnership made delivery ineffective and rendered the contract unenforceable. The chancellor also held that because Whalen lacked a real-estate license while acting as a realtor and brokering the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Century 21 Deep South Prop., Ltd. v. CorsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moss v. Batesville Casket Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Harris v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lane v. OustaletMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Stallworth v. SanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paradigm Fin. Grp., Inc. v. ChurchNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  2. Bdm Invs. v. Lenhil, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2014
  3. Jon Lunsford v. Process Technologies Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API