Legal Opinion

Paddock v. Chacko

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 7, 1989No. 72338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 So.2d 168 (1989)

Linda K. PADDOCK, Petitioner,

v.

Chawallur DeVassy CHACKO, M.D., Respondent.

No. 72338.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 7, 1989.

Neal P. Pitts, Orlando, Spence, Payne, Masington & Needle, P.A., and Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.

Harry K. Anderson, and E. Clay Parker and J. Scott Murphy of Parker, Johnson, Owen, McGuire & Michaud, Orlando, for respondent.

Joel I. Klein and Laurel Pyke Malson of Onek, Klein & Farr, Washington, D.C., and Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · McDONALD; Dissent; Concurrence · Kogan.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaisner v. KolbSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. Paddock v. ChackoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Wale v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lawlor v. OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Santa Cruz v. NW DADE COMMUNITY HEALTH CTR., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. State v. GeorgoudiouDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. White v. WhiddonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API