Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Pugh

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1986No. 85-93PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari in this case to consider the question of whether this defendant, in attacking the State's probable cause for his warrantless arrest and search, was entitled to learn the identity of a confidential police informant.

The facts are as follows:

About midmorning on April 14, 1982, Officer Jeff Stokes, a narcotics and vice detective for the Mobile Police Department, received a telephone call from a confidential police informant. The informant told Officer Stokes that a man named Lester Pugh, the defendant, was presently in Mobile and that he had a large quantity of drugs in his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. New v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Revis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Hamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API