Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Motion to Unseal Electronic Surveillance Evidence. Howard J. Smith v. Donn H. Lipton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1993No. 91-2385Published

1DissentBeam, Circuit Judge

ARNOLD, Chief Judge and BOWMAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, join.

I would reverse the district court and remand this case for further proceedings. Subject to the requirements of the panel opinion, In re Motion to Unseal Electronic Surveillance Evidence, 965 F.2d 637 (8th Cir.1992), now vacated by the court en banc, I would unseal the electronic surveillance evidence and make it available to Smith. My reasons are set forth in the panel opinion which is incorporated in this dissent by reference.

The court’s opinion introduces to this circuit a new concept of legislative…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API