Legal Opinion

Ouska v. Pearson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,398PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiffs alleged that defendants had in writing guaranteed payment of an issue of bonds aggregating $32,500, secured by trust deed, and as holders of an unpaid portion of these bonds sought to recover from defendants on this instrument. Upon trial they had a directed verdict, and judgment was entered against each of ilie defendants for $27,368.77. This appeal follows.

Upon trial plaintiffs introduced in evidence the document upon which suit is brought. Defendants claimed that it was uncertain and ambiguous in its terms and sought to introduce parol testimony explaining the circumstances…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Peoria Savings, Loan & Trust Co. v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Williams v. FletcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. CardwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gothberg v. NemerovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Alan P. Vernon v. Resolution Trust CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Wilkin v. Citizens National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. Gothberg v. NemerovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API