Legal Opinion
Giammanco v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2013No. ED 99209PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.
Introduction
Donald Giammanco (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying without an eviden-tiary hearing his claims that trial counsel1 provided ineffective assistance by failing to file motions to dismiss the case based on violations of Movant’s right to a speedy trial and right to be free from double jeopardy. Movant also contends the motion court clearly erred in denying without an evidentiary hearing his claim that he received ineffective…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Missouri v. David E. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Branch v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Butler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Christian Vannaman vs. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Darnell Hollings v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.