Legal Opinion
Lahm v. Bloomberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*531OPINION OF THE COURT
Kibbie F. Payne, J.
Petitioner moves pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a judgment annulling, as arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion, the determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, Article II, which denied petitioner’s application for an accident disability retirement (ADR) (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252) and granted petitioner, instead, a nonservice connected ordinary disability retirement (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-251). Additionally, petitioner seeks an order directing petitioner’s entitlement to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meyer v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Canfora v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tobin v. SteiselNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- MTR. OF DRAYSON v. Bd. of Trs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Archul v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lahm v. BloombergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Lahm v. BloombergNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004