Legal Opinion

Trifiro v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover moneys due and owing, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.H.O.), dated December 28, 1988, which denied his post-judgment motion to vacate a sheriff’s sale of real property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that, although the notice of sale was required to be served on the judgment debtor in accordance with CPLR 308 (see, CPLR 5236 [c]), the filing requirements for proof of service of process where such service is effectuated pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) or (4) do not apply to service…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gersten-Hillman Agency, Inc. v. Lichtenstein & Friedman Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API