Massee v. Parrott

1. Whether or not the act of 1916 modifying the usury laws of this State can be construed as in any wise affecting the established rule laid down by the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals, that a surety on a promissory note containing a waiver of homestead infected with usury without the surety’s knowledge is discharged from liability, the note here sued on to which this defense is pleaded, having been executed in the year 1914, can in no wise be affected by this act.

*110Decided September 28, 1922. J ohn R. L. Smith, Grady G. Harris, for Massee. H. F. Lawson, R. S. Wimberly, contra.

2. The…