Legal Opinion

Lamport v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 4, 1933No. Docket No. 51592Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARTHUR M. LAMPORT, SAMUEL C. LAMPORT, MARKS HUREWITZ, LEONARD L. ROTHSTEIN, AND SAMUEL HELLINGER, AS EXECUTORS OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF NATHAN LAMPORT, DECEASED, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Lamport v. Commissioner

Docket No. 51592.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

28 B.T.A. 862; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1067;

August 4, 1933, Promulgated

Emanuel H. Reichart, Esq., for the petitioners.

Lewis S. Pendleton, Esq., for the respondent.

SMITH

OPINION.

SMITH: This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in estate tax of $27,869.73. In his brief, counsel for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lamport v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API