State v. Pakulski
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
On appeal defendants argue the following: (1) the court erred in denying their motion to bar imposition of judgment on the armed robbery conviction based on a violation of their rights because certain exculpatory evidence was not timely disclosed; (2) the court erred in the imposition of sentences for armed robbery by violating their rights to freedom from double jeopardy and to due process of law; and (3) the court erred in sentencing defendants on their armed robbery convictions as this violated G.S. 15A-1335 because each defendant received a longer total sentence than was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Johnie M. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- State v. PooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LeaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013