Borgmeyer v. Idler
Supreme Court of the United States
. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. ■ Borgmeyer, administrator of the estate of Alexander Chataing, deceased, under letters granted September 14, 1892,-brought an action September 15, 1892, against William Idler and John W. Hazeltine, administrators de bonis non of the estate of Jacob Idler, deceased, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, averring that he was a citizen óf the State of New Jersey and that the…
Read the full summary
. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. ■ Borgmeyer, administrator of the estate of Alexander Chataing, deceased, under letters granted September 14, 1892,-brought an action September 15, 1892, against William Idler and John W. Hazeltine, administrators de bonis non of the estate of Jacob Idler, deceased, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, averring that he was a citizen óf the State of New Jersey and that the defendants weré citizens .of the State of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff’s- statement of claim or declaration, filed September…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee
In Colorado Central Mining Co. v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138, we held that when the original jurisdiction of a Circuit Court of the United States is invoked upon the ground that the deter mination of the suit depends upon some question .of a Federal nature, it must appear, at the outset, from the pleadings, that the suit is one of that character, of which the Circuit Court could properly take cognizance at the time its jurisdiction is invoked ; and that when the jurisdiction of a Circuit Court is invoked solely on the ground of diverse citizenship, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Co. v. TurckSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Gill v. Oliver's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Williams, Trustee v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
3Cited by13 opinions
- Loeb v. Columbia Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Zikos v. Oregon R. & Navigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910
- Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.