Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1990No. CV-89-0186-SAPublished

1DissentCameron, Justice

I

I dissent. I do not agree with the majority that an exchange of land is a sale simply because a value is assigned to one or all of the properties. I believe the plain meaning of the word “exchange” is the same as used in A.R.S. § 37-604 (Exchange Statute) and in the Enabling Act.

II

The majority states that “an exchange only occurs if no value is assigned to either of the exchanged properties.” The majority cites nine cases in support of this statement. I do not believe these nine cases support the proposition that assigning a value to land transforms an exchange into a sale.

In Gruver v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Trenton Cotton Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  5. Gruver v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API