Hunter v. Williams

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The plaintiffs brief, written in a lighter vein, states that the defendant owned a wandering bovine, which roamed the roads as well as the fields, and, upon being struck by plaintiffs car, caused damage as it somersaulted over the top of the car. The plaintiff sued the defendant. The municipal court dismissed his complaint. He appealed. The circuit court dismissed his complaint. He again appeals. Unfortunately, we must affirm under Rule 9(d).

Plaintiffs only argument on appeal is: “Plaintiff was not negligent; defendant was negligent.” In his statement of the case he…