Legal Opinion
Hanano v. Petrou
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 2, 1996No. 94-4067PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN NORTWICK, Judge.
Rajaa Hanano and George Horak, her husband, appeal an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice based on the application of the statute of limitations. Appellants filed a complaint against Steven P. Pe-trou, M.D., Mayo Clinic-Jaeksonville, and St. Luke’s Hospital Association, appellees, seeking damages for alleged medical malpractice and negligence arising out of the surgical removal of Hanano’s left kidney by Dr. Pe-trou and the related medical tests and diagnoses performed at Mayo Clinic and St. Luke’s. Appellees moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tanner v. HartogSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Glass v. CamaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Toledo Park Homes v. GrantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Hofer v. RossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S.A.P. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- SDI Quarry a/k/a Atlantic Civil, Inc. v. Gateway Estates Park Condominium AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Woods v. SapolskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002