Legal Opinion

Half Moon Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1942No. C. D. 656PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

Three varieties of peat moss are involved in this case. The importations were made at several ports and duty was assessed on the peat moss at the rate of 50 cents per ton under the eo nomine provision of paragraph 1548 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for peat moss. It is claimed by the plaintiffs that the commodity is free of duty under paragraph 1685 of the same act, which paragraph is as follows:

Par. 1685. Guano, basic slag (ground or unground), manures, and (notwithstanding any other provision of this Act) those grades of all other substances used chiefly for fertilizers, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Peat Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Frazee v. MoffittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peat Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  2. Peat Products Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  3. Protests 28785-K of Half Moon Mfg. & Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Protests 40847-K/12169 of Half Moon Mfg. & Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1943
  5. Protests 48444-K of Half Moon Mfg. & Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API