Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1999No. S-98-465Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGerrard, J.

I concur in the majority’s findings regarding respondent’s conduct and the imposition upon respondent of a 4-year suspension from the practice of law with the conditions for readmission stated therein. In addition, however, I would order respondent to submit to a psychiatric evaluation and further condition his reinstatement to the bar upon satisfactory compliance with all reasonable recommendations of that evaluation.

FACTUAL RECORD

The majority opinion persuasively sets forth several instances that not only demonstrate respondent’s unfitness for the practice of law, but also seem to evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CristOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State ex rel. Sorensen v. GoldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. EricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. FaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API