Legal Opinion

Clark's Valdosta, Inc. v. City of Valdosta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1968No. 24574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

To give petitioner standing to seek an injunction, it was necessary that it show impending illegal injury. The petition seeks to show that such alleged injury was preventing it from carrying on its ordinary business or calling which is not shown to be charitable or necessary and which is forbidden by State law. Code § 26-6905. The thrust of the case is the alleged invalidity of the city ordinance which is assailed upon numerous grounds. We can fully understand the concern of the city, as expressed by its attorney in his oral argument, for having firmly fixed the exact…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Cane Growers Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Kryder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Mayor &C. of Athens v. Co-Op Cab Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. McCaskill v. BowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Felton v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slone v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Medlin v. MickleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Tempo Management, Inc. v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. Medlin v. MickleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API