Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM LINCOLN. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Lincoln County. — Jos. C. Higgins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

The plaintiff in error, George Bishop, has appealed from a judgment of the circuit court of Lincoln county imposing upon him a fine of fifty dollars and the payment of the costs of the case for a violation of the quarantine rules and regulations adopted and promulgated by the commissioner of agriculture and State live stock inspector to prevent and restrict the spread of communicable and infectious diseases among domestic animals in this State.

The first question arises upon a demurrer to the indictment, which was overruled by the trial judge, and his action in that respect is assigned as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hawes v.City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. BoardmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  4. Keaton v. SniderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Brazeale v. StrengthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Richardson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API