Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dumont

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1987No. 1091, 1113 and 1368PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

These cases require us to consider various issues pertaining to convictions for gambling devices and criminal conspiracy regarding video poker machines located at different establishments in the city of Pittsburgh.

Initially, and of primary importance, we must determine whether discovery of the fact that a video poker machine is equipped with a “knock-off” switch provided probable cause to warrant its seizure as a gambling device per se, and if answered in the affirmative, whether a judge of the Pittsburgh magistrates court is authorized to issue a search warrant as process…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. ConleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. AlewineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. United States v. ConleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. In Re: Return of Seized Property of Lackawanna CtySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API