Legal Opinion

Brooks Waterfield Co. v. I. N. Walker Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided March 16, 1897Published

1Opinion of the CourtHollister, J.

The Brooks Waterfield Company brought a suit in attachment against Crouch, Davey & Co., a non-resident partnership, and garnisheed The I. N. Walker Company respecting moneys and credits in its lands'belonging to defendant in attachment. The garnishee answered, disclosing the sum of $94.47, which it offered to pay into court. The plaintiff, dissatisfied with this answer, sued the garnishee by virtue of the provisions of the statute in such case made and provided. The cause was tried to the court below, without the intervention of a jury; whereupon judgment was rendered for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Chase v. DayNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  5. Post v. GeogheganNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API