Kates v. Bok
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Reargument of an appeal by the defendants from an order entered March 15, 1910, continuing in part an injunction, etc., and from an order denying a motion for reargumént; and by the plaintiff from so much of said order of March 15, 1910, as vacates an order dated November 29, 1909, and denies a motion to continue said order during the pendency of the action. (See 139 App. Div. 640.)
1Per curiam
On the former argument of this appeal we declined to restrain, defendants from soliciting the customers of the old firm, following in that respect Von Bremen v. MacMonnies (138 App. Div. 319). The Court of Appeals has now reversed the order in the Von Bremen case in so far as it failed to enjoin the defendant therein from soliciting the customers of his former firm (200 N. Y. 41), and has in this respect gone the full length of Trego v. Hunt (L. R. [1896], App. Cas. 7), upon which plaintiff relied in his argument before us. Under this most re cent authoritative declaration of the law of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Von Bremen v. MacMonniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Komow v. Simplex Cloth Cutting Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919