Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Killeen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2001No. 25988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Michael J. Loomis brought this habeas corpus action, alleging that he was being held unlawfully following his arrest for an alleged parole violation. A magistrate dismissed Loomis’s petition, and the dismissal was affirmed by the district court. We conclude that Loomis’s right to due process was violat*609ed when the Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole delayed giving Loomis notice of the parole violation that was alleged to have occurred and failed to conduct a timely probable cause hearing on that allegation. However, because these constitutional violations do not presently…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. State v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mahaffey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dopp v. Idaho Commission of Pardons & ParoleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Loomis v. KilleenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API