Loomis v. Killeen
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Michael J. Loomis brought this habeas corpus action, alleging that he was being held unlawfully following his arrest for an alleged parole violation. A magistrate dismissed Loomis’s petition, and the dismissal was affirmed by the district court. We conclude that Loomis’s right to due process was violat*609ed when the Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole delayed giving Loomis notice of the parole violation that was alleged to have occurred and failed to conduct a timely probable cause hearing on that allegation. However, because these constitutional violations do not presently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Mahaffey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dopp v. Idaho Commission of Pardons & ParoleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- Loomis v. KilleenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001