Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Guay

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 20, 2011No. 2010-313Published

1ConcurrenceLynn, J.

I join fully in the majority’s thoughtful opinion in this case. I write separately, however, to address an issue that has troubled me for some time, that being our repeated use of the phrase “essential and reasonably necessary” as the standard for determining whether otherwise privileged materials, such as counseling records of the alleged crime victim, must be disclosed to the defense for use at trial.

We first used the phrase to describe the standard for disclosure of privileged materials to a criminal defendant in State v. Farrow, 116 N.H. 731, 733 (1976). In Farrow, we were “faced with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. GagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API