Legal Opinion

Takiff v. Infante

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided October 14, 1938No. 6477Published

1Opinion of the Court

Levinthal, J.,

Plaintiff’s amended bill of complaint avers that she is a judgment creditor of defendant Luigi Infante and holds a mortgage to secure the bond upon which the judgment was confessed. Luigi, it is further averred, had been a member of Infante Brothers, a partnership which was dissolved in August 1935, its assets then passing to defendant. Luigi is said to have conveyed that property to his daughter Jane, the other defendant, for an inadequate consideration. Luigi is insolvent and the mortgaged property insufficiently valuable to satisfy the debt. The transfer is attacked as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bamberger v. SchoolfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Sauber v. Nouskajian Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Pennsylvania Knitting Mills of Reading v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Stephens v. Regenstein & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Conemaugh Iron Works Co. v. Delano Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API