Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. DuBose

The brief filed for the railway company, plaintiff in error, opens with the following sentence: “ There is no error in the charge of the court, or in any ruling of the court upon the trial, A new trial should have'been granted because the verdict was contrary to the undisputed evidence.” The correctness of the state*608ment contained in the first sentence above quoted is fully concurred in, and no error of law is complained of. But a careful consideration of the evidence leads this court to a directly opposite conclusion from that stated in the second sentence above., The plaintiff in error, as…