Legal Opinion

Sigel Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

On the petition of her daughter and after a hearing at which appellant was not present, Emma Burk Sigel was found mentally defective in conformity with the Act of May 28, 1907, P. L. 292, as amended, 50 P.S. §941, et seq., and by a decree dated March 22, 1950, the Real Estate Trust Company, appellee, was appointed guardian of her estate. Later she petitioned the court below for a further hearing and for the discharge of the guardian. A further hearing was held in which she. testifieid, and' on November 20, 1950, the rule previously granted on her petition was discharged.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. VanderpoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Ryman's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Gorgas v. SaxmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Arthur's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Wingert CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Myers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Elliott EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Orsuto v. OrsutoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Mulholland v. Pittsburgh National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Earnshaw AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API