Howitt v. Blodgett
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEALS from the Circuit Court for 'Waukesha County. The facts (which are substantially the same in each case) are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff in each case appealed from the order substituting the assignee as defendant; from the order allowing the special answer filed by the assignee to stand as his answer, and vacating the judgment; and from the order setting aside the execution.
1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.
The same questions are presented for consideration by this court upon the two appeals taken in the above-entitled actions, and but one opinion will be necessary to dispose of all the questions raised upon the hearing of said appeals.
Each of the appellants commenced an action against the defendant, Boorman, May 2,1883, by personal service of the summons and writ of attachment, to recover a debt due from Boorman to him. Upon the commencement of said actions the plaintiffs made the proper affidavit therefor, and issued attachments against the property of the defendant, and the property of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sedgwick v. ClevelandNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Estabrook v. MessersmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Hawks v. PritzlaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Stockett v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rahr v. WittmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Eureka Steam Heating Co. v. SlotemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Keith v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Landauer v. VietorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Reitz v. HaywardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.