Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Bishop

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKleinfeld, J.

Plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to section 307 of the Civil Practice Act, to take deposition of defendant’s employer regarding defendant’s earnings for use upon a prospective motion to increase alimony. •

The motion lies under section 307. Defendant contends that the application is a “ fishing expedition ”, and cites Carmody *183on New York Pleading and Practice (Yol. I, p. 575) which discusses this section as follows:

“ The party must know what facts the person whose deposition is sought can testify to, and such facts must be relevant to " and necessary to the motion. The statute does not authorize a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tom Walton v. Marlen R. Owens and Yale and Towne Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Haber v. HaberNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Tom Walton v. Marlen R. Owens and Yale and Towne Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API