Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Bishop
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKleinfeld, J.
Plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to section 307 of the Civil Practice Act, to take deposition of defendant’s employer regarding defendant’s earnings for use upon a prospective motion to increase alimony. •
The motion lies under section 307. Defendant contends that the application is a “ fishing expedition ”, and cites Carmody *183on New York Pleading and Practice (Yol. I, p. 575) which discusses this section as follows:
“ The party must know what facts the person whose deposition is sought can testify to, and such facts must be relevant to " and necessary to the motion. The statute does not authorize a…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Tom Walton v. Marlen R. Owens and Yale and Towne Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Haber v. HaberNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Tom Walton v. Marlen R. Owens and Yale and Towne Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957