Legal Opinion
In re KBR, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 27, 2013No. Master Case No. RWT 09md2083PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.
On September 8, 2010, this Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF No. 99] denying the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Original Motion”) [ECF No. 21]. See In re: KBR Bum Pit Litig., 736 F.Supp.2d 954 (D.Md.2010). The Defendants have now filed a Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Renewed Motion”) [ECF No. 217], and the Court heard oral arguments on July 16, 2012. For the reasons that follow, the Renewed Motion will be granted and all cases in this multidistrict…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alan Metzgar v. KBR, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Nat'l Ass'n v. Bureau of the CensusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Adams v. American Federation of StateDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Sadler v. Pella Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Dowling v. A.R.T. Inst. of Wash., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.