Legal Opinion

Pisano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 30, 1988No. 87-295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Judge.

In this appeal from convictions and sentences for three counts of sexual battery, the appellant raises five issues and, on cross-appeal, the state raises one. We find merit only in one of the appellant’s issues, i.e., that costs were imposed without proper notice, opportunity to object, or statutory authority and that the written order does not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing. Accordingly, we reverse on this issue on the authority of Daniels v. State, 524 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and Stewart v. State, 522 So.2d 518 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988—Sentencing Guidelines)Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pisano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API