Legal Opinion

Cipico Construction, Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered October 13, 1999, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, denied petitioner contractor’s application to vacate the decision of respondent New York City Contract Dispute Resolution Board (CDRB) denying petitioner’s claim for additional compensation for costs of protecting and accommodating Time Warner Cable’s overhead lines, unanimously aifirmed, without costs.

In light of GET 350, a pre-bid addendum to the contract, specifically providing that the contractor would perform all labor to protect and accommodate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. New York Blood Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Thalle Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weeks Marine Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Delidakis Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. J.H. Electric of New York, Inc. v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API