Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1978No. 12473, 12474PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

Pursuant to I.C. § 19-2804(1), we review on appeal the district court’s granting of defendants’, Murphy and Olson, motions to dismiss the state’s informations against them for delivery of a controlled substance, a felony, I.C. § 37-2732(a). The state filed these appeals on December 30, 1976. Idaho Code § 19-2804 was in effect at that time and applies to this appeal.

Idaho Code § 19-2804(1) allows the state to appeal “[f]rom a judgment for the defendant on a demurrer to the indictment.” Although I.C.R. 12(a) abolishes demurrers, this Court has held that the state can appeal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. AverettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. EnglishHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Smallwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API