Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1989No. Civ. 890047Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partVande Walle, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The majority distinguishes Levey v. N.D. Workers Compensation Bureau, 425 N.W.2d 376 (N.D.1988), which upheld a Bureau decision to award vocational rehabilitation benefits for two years rather than four years because the “extent of pre-inju-ry earning capacity to which a claimant is entitled to be restored was not raised by Levey in his brief or in the petition for rehearing” and was not addressed in that opinion. The issue may not have been presented in precisely the manner conceptualized by the majority opinion but Levey did observe that the Bureau normally awards…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Wells County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. O'FALLON v. PollardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Spaeth v. Eddy Furniture Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API