Legal Opinion

Gossom v. Badgett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 22, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case 36 — PETITION— CITED Civil Code, secs. 156, 158. 17 Barbour, 274, Burger v. Columbian Ins. Co. 28 Barbour, 441, Gasper v. Adams. CITED 3 E. D. Smith, 280, Parsons v. Snydum. 15 Barb. 525, Harrington v. Higham. 21 Barb. 26, Bonsteel v. Vanderbilt. 16 Barb. 33, Parker v. Jackson. New York Civil Code, sec. 274. Kentucky Civil Code, secs. 398, 399, 402, 89, 38, 158. 1 Chitty’s Pleadings, p. 50. 14 B. Mon. 84. 1 Met. 339, 430.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HARDIN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Near the close of the late civil war Thompson Gossom, Cornelius Jenkins, and John C. Jenkins, of Warren County, to avoid being, coerced into the military service of the United States under a draft then about being enforced, through said Gossom engaged H. M. Garret, a “substitute broker” at Louisville, to furnish and procure to he accepted a substitute for each of them for the sum of one thousand dollars; and in pursuance of their arrangement with Garret they placed one thousand dollars each in the hands of W. H. Newman, of Louisville, to he paid…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Brantley's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  2. Curran v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Daugherty v. Bell National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Buford v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  5. Leader v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API