Legal Opinion

In Re Joseph Diruzzo v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 11, 2024No. 13-24-00099-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-24-00099-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE JOSEPH DIRUZZO On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina 1 0F On January 16, 2024, relator Joseph Diruzzo filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the district court “to convene a hearing as commanded by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” See generally Diruzzo v. State,

581 S.W.3d 788

(Tex. Crim.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bonilla, RosaliCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Ex parte JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. DensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API