Legal Opinion

Supreme Tribe v. Kraft

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1915No. 22,802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Posey Circuit Court; Eerdis F. Clements, Judge. Action by Clarence O. Kraft and others against the Supreme Tribe of Ben Hurl Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

— Action by appellees against appellant, an insurance corporation, on a death benefit certificate. There was a trial by the court resulting in a judgment for appellees. Appellant seeks a reversal of such judgment because, as averred, the court erred in overruling its demurrer to the third paragraph of reply to its answer, and in overruling its motion for a new trial.

*4281. 2. 3. 4. *427As to the first error relied on, it is sufficient to say that the record fails to disclose the filing of any demurrer to such *428paragraph, of reply. At the trial, appellee read in evidence the deposition of John C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. Enterprise InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Salt Creek Civil Township v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Fox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Willis v. KnauthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Essington v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API