Reid v. Mason
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. Action of replevin. The defendant justifies the taking of the property in controversy, under certain writs of attachment against Carl Cook, A. C. Dill, M. B. Warner, and E. R. Budd, partners under the name of “ E. R. Budd.” Plaintiff claims that he was the owner, and entitled to the possession of the goods when seized by the sheriff. Issue being joined, a trial was had, which resulted in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
There are several points made by the counsel for appellant in their argument that we do not think proper to refer to. It is assumed in the argument that the whole of the record and all the evidence introduced ' upon the trial is before us. The court, in its bill of exceptions, does' not certify that the evidence therein set forth is the whole of the evidence; nor does the clerk certify that the transcript sent up is a complete and full record of the case; on the contrary, he certifies that it contains but such portions thereof as he was directed to make.
Again, the record is voluminous, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McKinney v. HartmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Potter v. WoosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
3Cited by3 opinions
- Territory of Montana v. McAndrewsMontana Supreme Court · 1878
- Keatley v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Tootle, Livingston & Co. v. Phœnix Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883