Domico v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HILTON, Justice.
Plaintiff, the beneficiary in a life insurance policy written by defendant on the life of her husband, Joseph Domico, had a verdict for the full amount claimed. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
On January 22, 1931, in St. Paul, Minnesota, defendant, pursuant to an application there made, issued to Joseph Domico a policy on his life in the sum of $3,000. Plaintiff was the designated beneficiary therein. The right to change the beneficiary was reserved. Domico died on December 18, 1931,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shipman v. . Protected Home CircleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Hatch v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Wells v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Stacy v. GoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Rice v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Sanders v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Valley Forge Life Insurance v. LawrenceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.