Legal Opinion

Domico v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1934No. 29,771PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILTON, Justice.

Plaintiff, the beneficiary in a life insurance policy written by defendant on the life of her husband, Joseph Domico, had a verdict for the full amount claimed. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

On January 22, 1931, in St. Paul, Minnesota, defendant, pursuant to an application there made, issued to Joseph Domico a policy on his life in the sum of $3,000. Plaintiff was the designated beneficiary therein. The right to change the beneficiary was reserved. Domico died on December 18, 1931,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shipman v. . Protected Home CircleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Hatch v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Wells v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Stacy v. GoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Rice v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Sanders v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Valley Forge Life Insurance v. LawrenceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API