Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Associate Justice.
The issue here posed is, the effect of escalator clauses being included in a petition for rate increase. A somewhat similar question was presented in the recent case of Monsanto Chemical Co. v. Robinson, 225 Ark. 1006, 290 S. W. 2d 6 (opinion delivered February 20, 1956). In the present case the appellant is the Aluminum Company of America; and A. B. Green Fire Brick Company and Malvern Brick & Tile Company, designated as intern enors, also are on the same brief with the appellant. In addition to referring to these mentioned parties as “appellant” and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Simpson Bros., Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- E. F. Prichard Co., Inc. v. Heidelberg Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Simpson Bros. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- City of El Dorado v. Ark. Public Service Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT SECOND DIV.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT SECOND DIV.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.