Mitchell v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth District Court. All necessary facts and proceedings appear in the subjoined opinion. The judgment complained of was given by the district court, at November Term 1877.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
statementof Pecase. In July 1870, Sarah A. Mitchell obtained a decree of divorce from her husband, David H. Mitchell, on the ground of extreme cruelty, and, was allowed, as alimonD in the action, the sum of $14,000 to be paid a£ the end of ten years from the 1st of July 1870, the sum of $2,500 to be paid within ten days after the judgment, to enable her to purchase a homestead, and an annuity of $750, for the term of four years, payable quarterly each year, and the further annuity of $1,060, to commence after the expiration of the said…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Cariens v. CariensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.