Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1878PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Leavenworth District Court. All necessary facts and proceedings appear in the subjoined opinion. The judgment complained of was given by the district court, at November Term 1877.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

statementof Pecase. In July 1870, Sarah A. Mitchell obtained a decree of divorce from her husband, David H. Mitchell, on the ground of extreme cruelty, and, was allowed, as alimonD in the action, the sum of $14,000 to be paid a£ the end of ten years from the 1st of July 1870, the sum of $2,500 to be paid within ten days after the judgment, to enable her to purchase a homestead, and an annuity of $750, for the term of four years, payable quarterly each year, and the further annuity of $1,060, to commence after the expiration of the said…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Cariens v. CariensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API