Kay v. Clark

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

This court previously reversed the trial court upon authority of Colding v. Herzog, 467 So.2d 980, 983 (Fla.1985), wherein the supreme court held that “through its power to classify property for taxation purposes, the legislature has properly excluded household goods and personal effects without reference to the residency of the property owners.”

By motion for rehearing appellants suggest that this cause should be remanded to the trial court for further consideration of the class action allegations pled by appellants because those allegations have never been considered…