Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1918No. 9253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Accusation of adultery and fornication; from pity court of Floyd county — Judge Nunnally. September 28, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The court did not err in refusing to admit in evidence, on the trial of this ease on September 28, 1917, a conditional decree of divorce, granted in Alabama on August 4, 1917, by the express terms of which the decree of divorce could not become absolute in any event before six months after the grant thereof. This ease is easily differentiated from the eases cited by the plaintiff in error, each of which refers to remarriage after the decree of divorce is absolute.

2. Grounds B, C, and D of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are based upon alleged errors of the court in failing to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. LyonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Farkas v. Cohn & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burnley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API