Legal Opinion

Zeigler v. Borough of Carlisle

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County

Decided December 1, 1995No. 95-3614Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLEY, J.,

Plaintiff, Daniel L. Zeigler, age 35, filed a claim with the Borough of *439Carlisle seeking benefits for a heart ailment pursuant to what is known as the Heart and Lung Act. 53 P.S. §§637, 638. The claim was denied. Plaintiff appealed and had a local agency hearing before borough council on January 30, 1995. Council denied the claim based on the following conclusions of law:

“Zeigler’s full rate of salary is not fixed by ordinance or resolution, and therefore Zeigler is not entitled to benefits under the Heart & Lung Act.
“The borough did not have the right to exercise the requisite…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Harmony Volunteer Fire Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Organ v. Pa. State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Buchanan v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API