Legal Opinion

Hood v. Bloch Bros.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1886PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge :

Assumpsit brought February 19,1885, in the Circuit Court *246of Ohio county by William Hood against Samuel S. Bloch and Aaron Bloch, partners composing the firm of Bloch Bros., to recover $510.93, the price of cheese sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. The declaration contains the common counts and also a special count setting forth the contract for the sale of the cheese and the acceptance of it by the defendants. There was a demurrer to each count of the declaration, which the court overruled; the defendants pleaded non-assumpsit, and afterwards paid into court $306.14 and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Gallagher v. WaringNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. McClung v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Mason v. ChappellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
  5. Merriam v. FieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Acme Food Co. v. OlderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Buskirk Bros. v. PeckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pickens v. Coal River Boom & Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Oil-Well Supply Co. v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Nettles v. Imperial Distributors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API