Legal Opinion

Hull v. City of North Tonawanda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered March 5, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the second cause of action seeking damages based on an account stated.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking summary judgment on the second cause of action based on an account stated. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking payment for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Abbott, Duncan & Wiener v. RagusaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Seneca Pipe & Paving Co. v. South Seneca Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Enviroclean Services, LLC v. CEM, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Burlew v. Talisman Energy USA Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lippman v. ShafferNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bass Development of New York, Inc. v. BaischNew York Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API