Legal Opinion

Hodson v. Kiggens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1913No. 2719PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Osage County; C. T. Bennett, Judge. Action by Anna Hill Kiggens against W. 0. Hodson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKEE, C.

Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error as plaintiff, in 'accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

Among other specifications, the defendant argues: “Error of the court in overruling and denying defendant’s motion for peremptory instructions in his favor,” and in peremptorily instructing the jury to find for the plaintiff.

On September 15, 1910, in an .action by George Carl against Willis Hill for debt, accompanied by attachment of the property here involved as the property of said Willis Hill, the plaintiff being an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James Clark & Co. v. Wiss & BallardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Storms v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Summerville v. SorrensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Dilley v. McGregorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. Bray v. SaamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weeks v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. National Tank Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API