Goodyear Rubber Co. v. Knapp
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Waupaca County. The case is stated in the opinion. To the point that the affidavit was sufficient, they cited: Drake on Attach, secs. 102, 105; Morrison v. Fake, 1 Pin. 133; Elenk v. Schwalm, 19 Wis. Ill; Blum v. Davis, 56 Tex. 423; 22 id. 209; 59 id. 282; 42 Ind. 121; 28 Wis. 334; Broom’s Leg. Max. 627.
1Opinion of the CourtLyoN, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the circuit court denying a motion, made by him after judgment, to dissolve an attachment against the property of the defendant issued and executed in the cause. The ground of the motion was the alleged insufficiency of the affidavit annexed to the writ. The affidavit is in due form, except it is stated therein that the defendant has disposed of or assigned, etc., “ his property, or any part thereof,” or is about to do so, with intent to defraud his creditors. The question is whether an affidavit in that form is-sufficient.
In Miller v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jarvis v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Whitney v. BrunetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Miller v. MunsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Landon v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Butler v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barth v. GrafWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Billings v. NobleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Mariner v. Town of WaterlooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. LloydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. WeylandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.